Darren Aronofsky is nothing if not polarizing. Whether it is a mind-bending journey down a drug-fueled rabbit gap in “Requiem for a Dream,” or a darkish peek at eroticism on the skilled ballet circuit in “Black Swan,” the award-winning author/director’s movies are likely to elicit robust emotions.
Aronofsky’s newest opus “Mother!” is garnering a brand new form of suggestions from moviegoers. As with many Aronofsky flicks, many viewers seem like leaving the theaters confused about what it really is that they only watched. Per ordinary, the movie has additionally divided critics. But a vocal group of film watchers are additionally miffed as a result of they are saying the ultimate product on the massive display screen appears little or no just like the trailer selling the movie that they watched on TV or on-line.
The staff behind “Mother!” is not the one 1 to be accused of utilizing movie trailers and different film advertising instruments to promote moviegoers a invoice of products. Here are seven movies that did not precisely line up with their previews.
1. “Sweeney Todd,” 2007
The mixture of Tim Burton, Johnny Depp and the story of a murderous barber out for revenge in Victorian London is one thing akin to a holy trinity in some cinephile circles. It was definitely sufficient to get many of us out to the theatre when the movie dropped in 2007. The solely downside is that Dreamworks neglected 1 essential element within the movie’s trailer: “Sweeney Todd” is a musical. Johnny Depp sings. The total time. So do many of the characters. Sure, Broadway veterans definitely understood getting into that the film was primarily based on Sondheim ditties. The remainder of the gang was somewhat shocked.
2. “Drive,” 2011
Nicolas Winding Refn’s 2011 noir crime piece is a nuanced movie a couple of man who drives very well, and does not do a lot else. It received vital reward and rave evaluations from audiences, nevertheless it additionally supplied some filmgoers rather less than what they bargained for on the field workplace. Just about all the motion that takes place over the course of 100 minutes of film was additionally jammed into 2 and a half of minutes of film trailer. The excellent news is action-craving crowds nonetheless received to see a man get his head stomped in like a watermelon; the unhealthy information for those self same individuals is the movie was extra meditative and inventive than they’d anticipated.
3. “The Tree of Life,” 2011
If Aronofsky has a kindred spirit behind the digicam, it is fellow art-leaning director Terrence Malick. The man who delivered the Pacific World War II fever dream that’s “The Thin Red Line” in 1998 adopted it up with “The Tree of Life” 13 years later. The movie – which stars Brad Pitt, Sean Penn and Jessica Chastain — tells the story of a Texas household, the daddy’s reminiscence of his personal upbringing, and the way it all ties again to the creation of the universe. In different phrases, it is lengthy and generally robust to comply with, nevertheless it’s additionally a fantastically shot piece of movie.
If you watch the trailer, you are not prone to stroll away with any concept of what the movie is about aside from a household and a few strife. Then once more, some moviegoers had the identical expertise after strolling out of the theater; some cinemas even posted a no-refunds coverage for the movie, warning moviegoers forward of time they had been in for a nontraditional trip.
4. “National Treasure: Book of Secrets,” 2007
Nic Cage could also be an odd human being, however he’s additionally a cinematic treasure. For all the dreck that he churns out, it may be simple to neglect that the actor who first turned heads in “Raising Arizona” each every so often nonetheless has a delightfully excessive efficiency or 2 left within the tank. Unfortunately, “National Treasure” isn’t a type of movies. It isn’t good. So not good that the film’s advertising staff loaded its trailer with scenes that aren’t really within the movie.
5. “Scream,” 1996
If you had been a youngster in mid-’90s and keep in mind going to see “Scream” on the massive display screen, you possible additionally keep in mind anticipating Drew Barrymore to play a starring position within the horror flick. She was featured closely in film posters and adverts. She additionally did a lot of the press excursions upfront of the movie. Turns out Drew’s flip in entrance of the digicam for Wes Craven lasted about so long as the previews.
The misdirection was in all probability by design. “Scream” is a movie about horror movies, and the tropes that always function closely in them. Wes Craven needed us to suppose that Barrymore would play the damsel in misery protagonist position, and he needed us to be shocked when she met her very early demise.
6. “Lost in Translation,” 2003
Sofia Coppola and the staff behind “Lost in Translation” had been robbed. Sure, everybody knew going into the 2003 Oscars that “The Lord of the Rings” was going house with the perfect image award, however that does not imply it was the perfect image. The Coppola flick is a dry, darkish comedy about loneliness and Japanese whiskey. It isn’t the lighthearted romantic comedy that it was made out to be on this trailer.
7. “The Rules of Attraction,” 2002
“The Rules of Attraction” is a transfer about faculty starring James Van der Beek and Jessica Biel. What of us who usually are not Brett Easton Ellis disciples might not have recognized going into the movie is that it is primarily based on a ebook written by the man who penned “American Psycho.” This isn’t any easy “Animal House,” regardless of the trailer’s deal with intercourse, drug and rock ‘n’ roll on campus. It’s a jaunt over to the darker aspect of the dorm.